Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan, representing Kogi Central Senatorial District, has continued to gain public attention for her impressive record of constituency projects since assuming office. Her numerous developmental initiatives ranging from road rehabilitation to health, education, and empowerment programs have earned her praise from supporters who describe her as a “performing senator with results visible across communities.”
However, amid the commendations, some constituents have begun raising questions about the sources of funding for the growing number of projects executed under her name. A concerned observer recently queried, “Senator Natasha Akpoti is doing very well as a senator, but how does she get money to facilitate all these projects for Kogi Central?”
The inquiry reflects a broader public curiosity about how senators fund constituency interventions whether through government budgetary allocations, personal resources, or partnerships with development agencies. While transparency advocates urge public officials to disclose funding details for accountability, others maintain that what matters most is that the people of Kogi Central are finally witnessing tangible development. May be other senators from kogi state should take a lessons from Natasha on projects funding and execution.
As debates continue, Senator Akpoti’s performance remains a focal point in Kogi State politics, with many viewing her as a model for effective grassroots representation in the National Assembly.
Share your opinion constructively, does sources of fund matters to you or project?