In the first half of his second term, U.S. President Donald Trump has increased the use of military force abroad, signaling a shift back to more aggressive tactics.
Despite past promises to avoid prolonged wars, Trump has relied heavily on airstrikes across the Middle East, Central Asia, and Africa since re-entering the White House in January 2025.
Data from the Armed Conflict Location and Event Data Project (ACLED) shows that in just five months, the U.S. carried out over 520 air attacks in more than 200 locations.
That number nearly equals the total number of strikes under former President Joe Biden across four years. Countries hit include Yemen, Somalia, and Iran.
Trump’s administration says this military action is part of a broader approach focused on strength and quick responses.
His team calls it the “Trump Doctrine” — using diplomacy first, but turning to military force if talks fail.
Vice President JD Vance explained this framework publicly, but critics say it lacks structure and has led to confusion over U.S. goals.
Some military actions, like those in Yemen and Iran, have raised legal and humanitarian concerns.
Groups like Amnesty International have flagged possible war crimes, including bombings that hit a port and a migrant center.
Civilian deaths in Yemen this year alone are close to those recorded over the past two decades combined.
Analysts argue that Trump’s airstrike-heavy strategy may not lead to lasting peace.
In places like Yemen and Gaza, U.S. military campaigns have not stopped rebel attacks or changed conditions on the ground.
Trump’s decisions also reflect a drop in diplomatic efforts and a reduced role for the State Department.
While Trump frames these operations as fast and effective, observers caution that airstrikes alone may not resolve deep-rooted conflicts.
The long-term impact of this approach on global stability and U.S. relations remains uncertain.