Sir Keir Starmer’s plan to deploy British troops to Ukraine as part of a European military force has sparked widespread debate.
The proposed mission, developed alongside France, aims to provide intelligence and airspace monitoring rather than direct combat support. However, the Kremlin has condemned the plan, calling any NATO presence in Ukraine a direct threat.
Many UK citizens oppose the idea, citing an overstretched and underfunded military. They argue that sending troops without a major increase in defense spending is reckless. Others fear the move could escalate tensions and draw Britain into a larger conflict.
Supporters, however, believe Britain must take a firm stand against Russia, with some urging a more aggressive stance instead of waiting for U.S. intervention. Others suggest alternative solutions, such as a UN-led peacekeeping force instead of a NATO presence.
The debate reflects deeper concerns about Britain’s role in global conflicts, its military readiness, and growing uncertainty over U.S. foreign policy under Donald Trump.