A suit seeking to disqualify former President Goodluck Jonathan from contesting the 2027 presidential election has been adjourned till May 11, 2026.
Justice Peter Lifu of the Federal High Court in Abuja on Friday adjourned the matter following an application by the plaintiff’s counsel, Ndubuisi Ukpai, who told the court that he was recently served with a preliminary objection filed by the defence and needed time to respond.
The suit, which has continued to generate legal debate over Jonathan’s eligibility, is asking the court to determine whether the former president can lawfully present himself for another presidential contest under the 1999 Constitution.
However, proceedings took an early twist when counsel to Jonathan, Chris Uche, (SAN), informed the court that he only became aware of the matter through media reports and had been working to ensure that all necessary court processes on behalf of the former President were properly filed.
Uche also drew the court’s attention to what he described as similar issues previously determined by both the Federal High Court and the Court of Appeal, questioning why the controversy around Jonathan’s eligibility was resurfacing.
The Independent National Electoral Commission and the Attorney-General of the Federation, listed as second and third respondents, respectively, were not represented in court.
After listening to submissions from parties, Justice Lifu adjourned the case and ordered that hearing notices be properly served on all respondents before the next date.
The suit was instituted by a lawyer, Johnmary Jideobi, who is asking the court for declarations that Jonathan is constitutionally ineligible to contest the presidency again.
He is also seeking an order restraining the former president from presenting himself to any political party as a candidate in the 2027 general election, as well as a directive barring INEC from accepting or publishing his name as a presidential candidate.
At the heart of the case is a constitutional interpretation question posed by the plaintiff: “Whether in view of the combined provisions of sections 1(1), (2) and (3) and 137(3) of the 1999 Constitution, the 1st defendant is eligible, under any circumstances whatsoever, to contest for the office of the President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria.”
Jideobi argued that Jonathan had already exhausted the constitutional limits for the office, having completed the tenure of the late President Umaru Musa Yar’Adua after his death in 2010, and later serving a full four-year term after winning the 2011 presidential election.
In an affidavit filed in support of the suit, Emmanuel Agida, who deposed on behalf of the plaintiff, said the legal action became necessary following reports that Jonathan was considering another presidential bid in 2027.
According to the plaintiff, allowing Jonathan to contest—and potentially win—would amount to him taking the presidential oath of office for a third time, which he contends is prohibited under the Constitution.
Justice Lifu had earlier, on April 28, ordered that hearing notices be issued and served on all defendants after noting that some parties had yet to file responses in the matter.
The court is expected to return to the eligibility question on May 11 as the legal battle over Jonathan’s political future continues to unfold in Abuja’s corridors of judicial power.